4.5 Article

Cosimulation of Integrated Organic Photovoltaic Glazing Systems Based on Functional Mock-Up Unit

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16020951

Keywords

building simulation; integrated building systems; photovoltaic glazing systems; NZEB

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a method to simulate building-integrated photovoltaic glazing systems using semitransparent organic photovoltaic elements. The method uses a mathematical cosimulation model that considers heat transfer and is based on a functional mock-up unit developed in Python and the building simulation program Domus. The cosimulation model was verified and showed promising results, with each 6-m(2) glazing generating around 77 W of power, equivalent to 9% of available solar resource.
This study presents an approach to simulating building-integrated photovoltaic glazing systems composed of semitransparent organic photovoltaic (ST-OPV) elements. The approach consists of a mathematical cosimulation model based on the energy balance of complex glazing systems, considering heat transfer as conduction, mixed convection, and radiation effects. The cosimulation method is based on a functional mock-up unit (FMU) developed in Python and the building simulation program Domus. This work aims at presenting a cosimulation technique that can be easily applied to building energy simulation tools for the assessment of photovoltaic energy generation in glazing systems. The cosimulation glazing model was verified according to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2011, and the zone temperature was kept within with a root medium square error (RMSE) of 1.45 ?. The simulated building with an ST-OPV system showed promising results and could be applied to near-zero energy buildings since each 6-m(2) glazing has a power generation of around 77 W, equivalent to 9% of available solar resource.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available