4.5 Article

The Use of Hydrogen for Traction in Freight Transport: Estimating the Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Emissions in a Regional Context

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16010508

Keywords

freight transport; hydrogen; fuel cell electric vehicles; greenhouse gas emissions; fuel consumption

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) includes investments in hydrogen vehicle refuelling stations to promote the use of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) for long-haul freight transport. This study evaluates the potential impact on CO2 emissions and fuel consumption in the Campania region. The findings suggest significant savings in CO2 emissions and diesel consumption could be achieved.
The Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) includes, among other measures, investments in hydrogen vehicle refuelling stations, intending to promote the use of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) for long-haul freight transport. This paper evaluates the impact that this action could have on CO2 emissions and fuel consumption, focusing on a case study of the Campania region. The proposed approach, which can also be transferred to other geographical contexts, requires the implementation of a freight road transport simulation model; this model is based on the construction of a supply model, the estimation of road freight demand, and an assignment procedure for computing traffic flows. This study covers the period from 2025 to 2040, according to the forecasts of the NRRP and some assumptions on the action effects; moreover, it is assumed that hydrogen is entirely produced from renewable sources (green hydrogen). The key findings from three different scenarios show that savings between 423,832 and 778,538 tonnes of CO2, and between 144 and 264 million litres of diesel could be obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available