4.5 Article

Stamp-Charged Coke-Making Technology-An Empirical Model for Prediction of Coal Charge Density for Stamp Charging Coke Oven Batteries

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15249440

Keywords

coke; coking coals; stamping; densification; stamp charging

Categories

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund
  2. [POIR.01.02.00-00-0171/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of selected coal properties on the effectiveness of stamping operation by measuring the bulk density of stamped coal cake. An empirical mathematical model was developed to forecast coal cake density based on various coal parameters and stamping energy. The results show that density increases with stamping energy, specific coal particle diameter, ash content, and moisture content, while it decreases with volatile matter content.
Coke-making technology utilises two systems for charging the coke oven chambers with coal-a stamp-charged system (stamp-charging) and a gravity charged system (top charging). The presented study examines the impact of selected coal properties on the effectivity of the stamping operation by measuring the bulk density of the obtained stamped coal cake. An empirical mathematical model was developed that allows the forecasting of the coal cake density based on the most frequently assessed coal parameters, such as volatile matter, ash, moisture and particle size parameters, as well as the stamping operation parameter-cumulative stamping energy. The obtained results showed that the density of the stamped coal cake increases with the increase in the stamping energy (53.3 kg/m(3) increase, for increase in natural logarithm value of 1), RRSB specific coal particle diameter d ' (6.4 kg/m(3) increase, for each 0.1 mm increase in d '), ash content (8.9 kg/m(3) increase, for 1% point increase) and moisture content (4 kg/m(3) increase, for 1% point increase), and decreases with the increase in volatile matter content (3.82 kg/m(3) decrease, for 1% point increase).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available