4.5 Article

Robust Fractional MPPT-Based Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm for Thermoelectric Generation Applications

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15238836

Keywords

energy efficiency; fractional order control; MPPT; TEG; optimization methodologies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an improved fractional MPPT method to increase the energy harvesting efficiency of TEGs. The method utilizes fractional order control and the MFO algorithm to optimize the system parameters. Compared with other optimization algorithms, this method demonstrates better tracking performance in both dynamic and steady-state conditions.
Depending on the temperature difference between the hot and cold sides of the thermoelectric generator (TEG), the output performance of the TEG can be produced. This means that it is necessary to force a TEG based on robust maximum power point tracking (MPPT) to operate close to its MPP at any given temperature or load. In this paper, an improved fractional MPPT (IFMPPT) is proposed in order to increase the amount of energy that can be harvested from TEGs. According to the suggested method, fractional order control is used. A moth-flame optimizer (MFO) was used to determine IFMPPT's optimal parameters. A comparison of the results obtained by the MFO is made with those obtained by a particle swarm optimizer, genetic algorithm, gray wolf optimizer, seagull optimization algorithm, and tunicate swarm algorithm in order to demonstrate MFO's superiority. IFMPPT's primary objective is to enhance dynamic responses and exclude steady-state oscillations. Consequently, incremental resistance and perturb and observe are compared with the proposed strategy's performance. It was revealed that IFMPPT provides superior tracking results both in dynamic and steady-state conditions when compared with traditional methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available