4.6 Article

INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS, AND THE PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF HIGH BODY MASS INDEX AGAINST SARCOPENIA IN SUBURB-DWELLING ELDERLY CHINESE POPULATIONS

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1056-1060

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0704-3

Keywords

AWGS; body mass index; Chinese; sarcopenia; suburb-dwelling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372118]
  2. Health and Family Planning Commission of Tianjin municipality [2014KZ006]
  3. Public Health Bureau of Tianjin Binhai New Area [2014BWKZ003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few studies have explored the risk factors of sarcopenia in certain cohorts. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of sarcopenia and associated factors over a 1-year period in an elderly Chinese suburban population. Methods: This study was conducted on 356 Chinese suburb-dwelling participants aged >= 60 years, for whom detailed information regarding sociodemographics, behavioral characteristics, and medical conditions had been documented. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria. Sarcopenia incidence was documented after one year of follow-up, and correlated with several possible factors. Results: At baseline, 64 (9.7%) of the initial 657 participants had sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 10.4% after one year. Between baseline and 1-year follow-up, 13 of the participants without sarcopenia at baseline had developed sarcopenia. After multivariate adjustments, it was found that the incidence of sarcopenia increased with age and high body mass index (BMI) is associated with less incidence of sarcopenia. Incidence was also higher among women. Conclusions: We found sarcopenia incidence increased with age, and women were more likely to have sarcopenia. A higher BMI is also associated with a lower incidence of sarcopenia. Maintaining a healthy weight could be beneficial in the prevention of sarcopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available