4.5 Article

Cuttings Bed Height Prediction in Microhole Horizontal Wells with Artificial Intelligence Models

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15228389

Keywords

cuttings bed height; artificial intelligence model; horizontal well; dimensionless model; solid-liquid flow

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52104009]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2021YFA0719101]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2-9-2019-99]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing [PRP/open-2111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study employs artificial intelligence models to predict the cuttings bed height in the well-bore. The experiment results show that the ANN model performs the best among other artificial intelligence models.
Inadequate drill cuttings removal can cause costly problems such as excessive drag, lower rate of penetration, and even mechanical pipe sticking. Cuttings bed height is usually used to evaluate hole-cleaning efficiency in horizontal wells. In this study, artificial intelligence models, including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), were employed to predict cuttings bed height in the well-bore. A total of 136 different tests were conducted, and cuttings bed height under different conditions were measured in our previous study. By training four different artificial intelligence models with the experiment data, it was found that the ANN model performed best among other artificial intelligence models. The ANN model outperformed the dimensionless cuttings bed height model proposed in our previous study. Due to the amount of data points, the memory ability of RNN and LSTM models has not been entirely played compared with the ANN model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available