4.6 Article

How long do bracken (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn) control treatments maintain effectiveness?

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106842

Keywords

P; aquilinum; Asulam; Cutting; Ecological restoration; Generalized additive mixed models; Invasive species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pteridium aquilinum is a problematic invasive species in the British uplands, and there is a lack of knowledge on long-term weed control and land improvement. The effects of six control treatments on P. aquilinum were assessed at two acid-grassland sites in Scotland. The results showed different treatment effects for P. aquilinum-performance, agricultural improvement, and species richness in the two experiments.
Pteridium aquilinum is a problematic, perennial, invasive species worldwide that poses serious problems in the British uplands. However, there is a lack of knowledge on long-term success in terms of weed control and land improvement. We assessed the effects of six P. aquilinum-control treatments at two acid-grassland sites in the Scottish Borders (Sourhope 1 & 2). There were six treatments: (i) untreated, (ii) cutting once-yearly, (iii) cutting twice-yearly, (iv) asulam sprayed in year 1, (v) cutting once in year 1/asulam in year 2, and (vi) asulam in year 1/cut in year 2. The annual cutting treatments were stopped after 9/10 years. We measured the response of three variables over 25/26-years assessing P. aquilinum-performance, agricultural-improvement and species richness. We estimated the treatment effect window, defined as the period over which the P. aquilinum-control treat-ments had a significant effect relative to untreated experimental-controls.Results were completely different for all variables in the two experiments. At Sourhope 1 the cutting treat-ments had much longer effect windows than the herbicide-based treatments in reducing P. aquilinum perfor-mance, especially the cut twice-yearly treatment with a 25-year window. At Sourhope 2, the treatment differences were much reduced with the best treatment (cut twice yearly) producing a 13-year window. At both experiments, asulam-based treatments produce a minimum effect window of 10 years. Increases in both the agricultural-improvement index and species richness were also obtained at both sites. Effect windows for both agricultural-improvement index (TVI) and species richness also showed some improvement; effect windows were obtained of 12-20 and 9-20 years for TVI, and 7-17 and 2-10 years for species richness at Sourhope 1 and Sourhope 2 respectively. Species richness declined though time in both experiments.Cutting, and preferably twice per year, was the most effective treatment but also the costliest, with the most cost-effective approach being a single asulam spray. However, the length of the effect windows suggest that repeat-spraying every 10-years is needed. Unfortunately, where the aim is to recover biodiversity interventionist techniques such as seeding will also be needed.The use of effect windows for estimating long-term impact of perennial weed control is novel and may be of use in other situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available