4.7 Article

Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107612

Keywords

Pastoral livelihoods; Ecosystem service dependence; Sedentarization; Household comparison; Ecosystem management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study finds that sedentarization does not decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services, especially for sedentary farming households in Fuyun County, northwestern China. Livestock remains the main medium by which pastoral households rely on ecosystem services and the main source of income. The importance of monitoring pastoral livelihood dynamics and implementing matching development strategies after settlement to reconcile pastoral livelihoods and ecosystem conservation is emphasized.
Seasonal migration is a widely distributed livelihood strategy in pastoral regions worldwide. To improve live-lihood levels and prevent grassland degradation, sedentarization has been broadly adopted. However, the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services after settlement has scarcely been studied. Here, we develop a new framework to visualize the contributions of grassland ecosystems, farmland ecosystems and so-cioeconomic systems to pastoral livelihoods and take Fuyun County, a typical pastoral county in northwestern China, to analyze whether sedentarization decreases the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem ser-vices by comparing the livelihoods of different household types. Settled households derive less income from ecosystem services than household types that practice grazing. However, settlement has not necessarily reduced the share of income from ecosystem services. Settled household types still rely on grassland ecosystems, espe-cially sedentary farming households. Although pastoralists have undergone tremendous livelihood transitions, livestock have always been the main medium by which pastoral households rely on ecosystem services and the main source of income. Our results emphasize the importance of monitoring pastoral livelihood dynamics and implementing matching development strategies after settlement to reconcile pastoral livelihoods and ecosystem conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available