4.7 Review

Small biotechs versus large pharma: Who drives first-in-class innovation in oncology?

Journal

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103456

Keywords

Biopharmaceutical R& drug development; cancer; oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a narrative that large pharma relies on biotech and academia for drug innovation. However, our research shows that while biotechs and academia do originate more drugs, large pharma remains important in shepherding drugs through clinical development and approval, and in originating high-impact novel therapies. Our analysis of FDA-approved first-in-class oncology drugs from 2010 through 2020 indicates that large pharma was the sole originator of only 14% of these drugs, while small biotechs originated 46%, and academic labs 14%. Despite this, large pharma companies launched or were involved in launching 76% of these drugs, including three of the five top-selling ones.
There is a narrative that large pharma relies on biotech and academia for drug innovation. We tested this thesis by identifying the originators of all 50 first-in-class (FIC) oncology drugs that were approved by the FDA from 2010 through 2020. Overall, the numbers support the narrative: large pharma was the sole originator of only 14% of FIC cancer drugs, whereas small biotechs originated 46%, and academic labs 14%. However, origins tell an incomplete story: large pharma companies launched or were involved in launching 76% of FIC cancer drugs. Moreover, three of the five top-selling FIC oncology drugs had large pharma origins. Thus, although biotechs and academia do originate more drugs, large pharma remains important in shepherding drugs through clinical development and approval, and in originating high-impact novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available