4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of novel hemostatic gel in endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillectomy: A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 527-533

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.157

Keywords

Post-procedural bleeding; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Endoscopic papillectomy; Hemostatic gel; Randomized controlled trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hemostatic gel for post-EST or post-EP bleeding. The results showed that the new hemostatic gel was superior to epinephrine spray for successful primary hemostasis, and there was no significant difference in delayed bleeding. The novel hemostatic gel is expected to achieve easier hemostasis for immediate bleeding after EST or EP.
Background: Endoscopists often experience obstacles with traditional hemostasis using the side-viewing duodenoscope for bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillectomy (EP). Aims: In this randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hemostatic gel for post-EST or post-EP bleeding.Methods: A randomized trial was conducted from November 2020 to December 2021 at two tertiary centers in South Korea. Patients who experienced bleeding immediately after EST or EP were enrolled in the study, and primary hemostasis was achieved with either the novel hemostatic gel or epinephrine spray.Results: A total of 84 patients were enrolled in this study, and 41 patients were finally analyzed in each group. Hemostatic gel was significantly superior to epinephrine spray for successful primary hemostasis (100% vs. 85.4%; P = 0.026). ). In terms of delayed bleeding, no significant difference was observed be-tween the hemostatic gel and epinephrine spray (2.4% vs. 7.3%; P = 0.329). The mean procedural time was significantly higher for the hemostatic gel than epinephrine spray (3.23 +/- 1.94 vs. 1.76 +/- 0.99 min; P < 0.001), and no differences were observed in the adverse events. Conclusions: The novel hemostatic gel is expected to achieve satisfactory results with easier hemostasis for immediate bleeding after EST or EP. (Registered in Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0 0 05607)(c) 2023 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available