4.5 Article

An image-based methodology to evaluate oat panicle architecture

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 648-661

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20884

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research proposed an image-based strategy and methodology to evaluate oat panicles, obtaining panicle traits through image analysis using MATLAB. The heritability of all panicle traits was high between 0.76 and 0.93, and significant genotypic differences for panicle architecture traits could be detected with a high power of 0.80 using six panicles per replication.
Panicle size and architecture are traits of major relevance for oat production as they play a key role in conditioning the potential number of grains per spikelet and in consequence grain shape, size, and distribution. The aim of this research was to propose an image-based strategy and methodology to evaluate oat panicles. Specifically, the goals were to create and deploy the foundations for a high-throughput methodology to phenotype oat panicles and to determine the optimum number of panicles needed to detect differences between genotypic means for oat panicle traits with high power. A total of 48 genotypes were evaluated in four field experiments with three true replications in two locations and 2 years. Ten panicles per experimental unit were harvested and evaluated with image analysis using MATLAB. Panicle length, width, aspect ratio, compactness, and digital biomass were obtained from the images. The heritability of all panicle traits was high between 0.76 and 0.93. A high power of 0.80 to detect significant differences at an alpha of 0.05 among genotypic means for all panicle architecture traits was reached with the use of six panicles per replication. Our results showed a highly efficient and powerful strategy to study panicle architecture in oat. This methodology could be scaled-up to efficiently phenotype large populations and provide the basis for understanding panicle architecture and grain morphology in oat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available