4.6 Review

Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma: An overview of systematic reviews

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103842

Keywords

Overview; Multiple myeloma; Carfilzomib; Proteasome inhibitor; Efficacy; Safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This overview presents a summary of systematic reviews on the safety and efficacy of carfilzomib in multiple myeloma. The results show that carfilzomib is effective in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, but is associated with cardiovascular adverse events, nephrotoxicity, and serious infections.
In this overview we present a summary of evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) on the safety and efficacy of carfilzomib in multiple myeloma (MM). Our search in electronic databases and conference proceedings yielded 14 eligible SRs, graded as of low overall quality with the AMSTAR-2 tool. The Corrected Covered Area index was 52.3% which shows very high overlap among studies. Carfilzomib was shown to increase progression free sur-vival (HR=0.61, 95%CI=0.47-0.78, p = 0.01, I2 =73%), overall survival (HR=0.79,95%CI=0.66-0.95, p = 0.01, I2 =0) and overall response rate (OR=2.4,95% CI=1.6-3.4, p < 0.001, I2 =99%) in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM); all with moderate quality of evidence assessed with the GRADE approach. Carfilzomib was associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) (RR=2.2, 95%CI=1.6-2.9, p < 0.001, I2 =0), nephrotoxicity (RR=1.79, 95% CI=1.43-2.23, p < 0.001, I2 =39%) and serious infections (RR=1.40, 95%CI=1.17-1.69, p < 0.001, I2 =57%). Concluding, carfilzomib is effective in RRMM, but associated with certain AEs. More randomized clinical trials and high-quality SRs, especially on newly diagnosed patients are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available