4.6 Review

International consensus on the initial diagnostic workup of cancer of unknown primary

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103868

Keywords

Cancer of unknown primary; Diagnostics; CUP; Delphi study; International; Consensus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes a multi-layer classification for the diagnostic workup of CUP using the Delphi method. The recommended initial diagnostic includes history and physical examination, full blood count, serum marker analysis, biopsy of accessible lesion, CT scan, and immunohistochemical testing. Consensus was also reached on the need for an ideal diagnostic lead time for CUP patients.
Background: Although the incidence of Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is estimated to be 1-2 % of all cancers worldwide, no international standards for diagnostic workup are yet established. Such an international guideline would facilitate international comparison, provide adequate incidence and survival rates, and ultimately improve care of patients with CUP.Methods: Participants for a four round modified Delphi study were selected via a CUP literature search in PubMed and an international network of cancer researchers. A total of 90 CUP experts were invited, and 34 experts from 15 countries over four continents completed all Delphi survey rounds.Findings: The Delphi procedure resulted in a multi-layer CUP classification for the diagnostic workup. Initial diagnostic workup should at least consist of history and physical examination, full blood count, analysis of serum markers, a biopsy of the most accessible lesion, a CT scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis, and immunohistochemical testing. Additionally, the expert panel agreed on the need of an ideal diagnostic lead time for CUP patients. There was no full consensus on the place in diagnostic workup of symptom-guided MRI or ultrasound, a PET/CT scan, targeted gene panels, immunohistochemical markers, and whole genome sequencing. Interpretation: Consensus was reached on the contents of the first diagnostic layer of a multi-layer CUP classifi-cation. This is a first step towards full consensus on CUP diagnostics, that should also include supplementary and advanced diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available