4.4 Article

Oxidation Behavior of Si-Modified Aluminide Coatings on K438 Superalloy Prepared Using a Hybrid Slurry/Pack Cementation Process

Journal

CORROSION
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 111-120

Publisher

NATL ASSOC CORROSION ENG
DOI: 10.5006/4150

Keywords

hybrid slurry; oxidation; pack cementation process; Si-modified aluminide coating; superalloy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Si-modified aluminide coating was prepared on nickel-based K438 superalloy using a hybrid slurry/pack cementation process. The coatings exhibited a two-layer structure, with an outer Al-rich Ni0.9Al1.1 layer and an inner interdiffusion layer. Compared to simple aluminide coatings, the Si-modified aluminide coatings showed lower oxidation rate and improved alumina scale adhesion at 1,100 degrees C. Additionally, the Si-modified aluminide coatings had longer service life due to the addition of Si, while the simple aluminide coatings lost protection after 300 hours.
A Si-modified aluminide coating was prepared on nickel-based K438 superalloy using a hybrid slurry/pack cementation process. The microstructures indicated that the coatings exhibited a two-layer structure: the outer Al-rich Ni0.9Al1.1 layer with the dispersion of minor Ni2Al3 and Cr-rich phases of Al13Cr2 and Cr5Si3 and the inner interdiffusion layer. For comparison, simple aluminide coatings were also produced using normal pack cementation. Compared with the K438 superalloy and simple aluminide counterpart, the Si-modified aluminide coatings exhibited a lower oxidation rate and improved alumina scale adhesion in air at 1,100 degrees C. Furthermore, the Si-modified aluminide coatings showed longer service life compared to the simple aluminide coatings because the addition of Si mitigated the degradation of coatings. Therefore, the simple aluminide lost protection while the Si-modified aluminide coatings were still protective after 300 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available