4.1 Article

Participant recruitment and retention from vulnerable populations in clinical trials is a matter of trust

Journal

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106969

Keywords

Vulnerable populations; Recruitment; Retention; Clinical trials; Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical research sites often struggle with recruiting and retaining vulnerable populations. It is important to ensure that individuals in vulnerable populations have access to any relevant clinical research, while providing appropriate protections. Establishing trust is crucial for effective recruitment and retention of vulnerable populations, especially with the new trends in the drug development industry.
Clinical research sites can struggle with recruiting and retaining vulnerable populations. Vulnerable research participants often have significant trauma histories making traditional approaches to recruitment and retention tenuous. Due to these difficulties, vulnerable populations are often intentionally excluded from clinical research due to the additional time and work involved. While it is important to provide protections for any participant that has decreased autonomy or increased susceptibility to coercion, it is equally important to assure that in-dividuals in vulnerable populations have access to any clinical research that might pertain to them. In addition, the new trends in the drug development industry including early-stage development, risk-identification, pre-ventative care, and disease spread modeling are likely to include health disparate patient populations that have increased probability of vulnerability. In this article we discuss the roots of many vulnerabilities and how to foster trust for more effective recruitment and retention of vulnerable populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available