4.7 Article

Experimental characterisation of as-built and retrofitted timber-masonry connections under monotonic, cyclic and dynamic loading

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129446

Keywords

Timber -masonry connections; Damage; Retrofitting; Seismic Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. NAM (Nederlandse Aaardolie Maatschappij)
  2. [CS2B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents an experimental study conducted at Delft University of Technology to investigate the characteristics of timber-masonry connections in the context of gas-induced earthquakes in the province of Groningen, Netherlands. The tests were conducted under various loading conditions to analyze the response of the connections in terms of strength, stiffness, and damage evolution. The obtained results provide valuable insights into the properties of existing connections and the effectiveness of retrofitting methods.
In the province of Groningen (NL), where human-induced earthquakes take place due to gas extraction, a large part of the building stock is composed of brick masonry walls and timber diaphragms. In this framework, timbermasonry connections play a crucial role in the global seismic response of the buildings, but their properties and structural behaviour have not been investigated yet for the Dutch context. This work describes the experimental campaign conducted at Delft University of Technology to characterize as-built and strengthened timber-masonry connections. The joints were tested under either quasi-static monotonic, cyclic or dynamic loading, to analyse the effect of an induced earthquake signal on the connections' response in terms of strength, stiffness and damage evolution. The obtained test results provided more insight into the capacity and properties of existing connections, and useful knowledge on the effectiveness of the tested retrofitting methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available