4.7 Article

Environmental impact assessment of alkali-activated materials: Examining impacts of variability in constituent production processes and transportation

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 363, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129032

Keywords

Alkali-activated materials (AAM); Life cycle assessment (LCA); Sodium silicates; Blast furnace slag; Fly ash; Metakaolin; Portland cement; Transportation; Life cycle inventory variability; Life cycle impact uncertainty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the environmental impacts of alkali-activated concretes containing blast furnace slag, fly ash, and metakaolin with Portland cement concretes. The production processes of the mix constituents and transportation distances are evaluated, and it is found that alkali-activated materials have significantly lower CO2 eq. emissions than PC concretes. Taking into account the variability in production technologies of precursors and activators, alkali-activated materials still have lower CO2 eq. emissions than PC concretes.
This study compares the environmental impacts of blast furnace slag-, fly ash-, and metakaolin-based alkali -activated concretes with Portland cement (PC) concretes using life cycle assessment methodology. The variability in production processes of mix constituents across Europe and uncertainty associated with transportation dis-tances are evaluated for both types of concrete. The recent data on soluble sodium silicates production was obtained from European manufacturers. Results show that alkali-activated materials have up to 57 % lower CO2 eq. emissions than PC concretes, while activators contribute between 13 % and 33 % to the total GWP of AA concrete mixes, depending on mix design. This paper concludes that taking into account variability in production technologies of precursors and activators, as well as of PC, alkali-activated materials still have lower CO2 eq. emissions than PC concretes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available