4.7 Article

Head-to-Head Comparison of 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A Prospective Study of 59 Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 451-457

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180430

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors; somatostatin receptor imaging; Cu-64-DOTATATE; Ga-68-DOTATOC; PET/CT

Funding

  1. National Advanced Technology Foundation
  2. Danish Cancer Society
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Novo Nordic Foundation
  5. Danish Medical Research Council
  6. Svend Andersen Foundation
  7. Research Council for Strategic Research
  8. Rigshospitalets Research Council
  9. Research Foundation of the Capital Region
  10. Arvid Nilsson Foundation
  11. John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
  12. A.P. Moeller Foundation
  13. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15OC0017912] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. The Danish Cancer Society [R146-A9491] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Somatostatin receptor imaging is a valuable tool in the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment planning of neuroendocrine tumor (NET). PET-based tracers using Ga-68 as the radioisotope have in most centers replaced SPECT-based tracers as the gold standard. Cu-64-DOTATATE is a new PET tracer that has been shown to be far superior to the SPECT tracer In-111-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide. Because of the advantages of Cu-64 over Ga-68, we hypothesized that the tracer has a higher sensitivity than Ga-68-based tracers. To test this hypothesis, we compared on a head-to-head basis the diagnostic performance of Cu-64-DOTATATE with that of Ga-68-DOTATOC in NET patients. Methods: Fifty-nine NET patients were scanned with both Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT and compared on a head-to-head basis. Discordant lesions were verified during at least 30 mo of follow-up. Results: A total of 701 lesions were concordantly detected on both Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT scans, whereas an additional 68 lesions were found by only one of the scans. Cu-64-DOTATATE showed 42 lesions not found on Ga-68-DOTATOC, of which 33 were found to be true-positive on follow-up. Ga-68-DOTATOC showed 26 lesions not found on Cu-64-DOTATATE, of which 7 were found to be true-positive on follow-up. False-positives were mainly lymph node lesions. Accordingly, 83% of the additional true lesions found on only one of the scans were found by Cu-64-DOTATATE. On a patient-basis, additional true lesions were found by Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC in 13 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients with additional lesions also had concordant lesions found by both scans. Conclusion: Cu-64-DOTATATE has advantages over Ga-68-DOTATOC in the detection of lesions in NET patients. Although patient-based sensitivity was the same for Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC in this cohort, significantly more lesions were detected by Cu-64-DOTATATE. Furthermore, the shelf life of more than 24 h and the scanning window of at least 3 h make Cu-64-DOTATATE favorable and easy to use in the clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available