Journal
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 451-457Publisher
SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180430
Keywords
neuroendocrine tumors; somatostatin receptor imaging; Cu-64-DOTATATE; Ga-68-DOTATOC; PET/CT
Funding
- National Advanced Technology Foundation
- Danish Cancer Society
- Lundbeck Foundation
- Novo Nordic Foundation
- Danish Medical Research Council
- Svend Andersen Foundation
- Research Council for Strategic Research
- Rigshospitalets Research Council
- Research Foundation of the Capital Region
- Arvid Nilsson Foundation
- John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
- A.P. Moeller Foundation
- Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15OC0017912] Funding Source: researchfish
- The Danish Cancer Society [R146-A9491] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Somatostatin receptor imaging is a valuable tool in the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment planning of neuroendocrine tumor (NET). PET-based tracers using Ga-68 as the radioisotope have in most centers replaced SPECT-based tracers as the gold standard. Cu-64-DOTATATE is a new PET tracer that has been shown to be far superior to the SPECT tracer In-111-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide. Because of the advantages of Cu-64 over Ga-68, we hypothesized that the tracer has a higher sensitivity than Ga-68-based tracers. To test this hypothesis, we compared on a head-to-head basis the diagnostic performance of Cu-64-DOTATATE with that of Ga-68-DOTATOC in NET patients. Methods: Fifty-nine NET patients were scanned with both Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT and compared on a head-to-head basis. Discordant lesions were verified during at least 30 mo of follow-up. Results: A total of 701 lesions were concordantly detected on both Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT scans, whereas an additional 68 lesions were found by only one of the scans. Cu-64-DOTATATE showed 42 lesions not found on Ga-68-DOTATOC, of which 33 were found to be true-positive on follow-up. Ga-68-DOTATOC showed 26 lesions not found on Cu-64-DOTATATE, of which 7 were found to be true-positive on follow-up. False-positives were mainly lymph node lesions. Accordingly, 83% of the additional true lesions found on only one of the scans were found by Cu-64-DOTATATE. On a patient-basis, additional true lesions were found by Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC in 13 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients with additional lesions also had concordant lesions found by both scans. Conclusion: Cu-64-DOTATATE has advantages over Ga-68-DOTATOC in the detection of lesions in NET patients. Although patient-based sensitivity was the same for Cu-64-DOTATATE and Ga-68-DOTATOC in this cohort, significantly more lesions were detected by Cu-64-DOTATATE. Furthermore, the shelf life of more than 24 h and the scanning window of at least 3 h make Cu-64-DOTATATE favorable and easy to use in the clinical setting.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available