4.7 Article

T-splines computational membrane-cable structural mechanics with continuity and smoothness: II. Spacecraft parachutes

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages 677-686

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-022-02265-9

Keywords

Isogeometric analysis; T-splines; Membrane-cable structure; Continuity; Smoothness; Spacecraft parachute; Disk-Gap-Band parachute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, the authors present the T-splines computational method for spacecraft parachute structural mechanics computations. The method allows for connecting structures with different parametric dimensions and ensures continuity and smoothness. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through computations involving both membrane and shell models of the parachute canopy fabric.
In this second part of a two-part article, we present spacecraft parachute structural mechanics computations with the T-splines computational method introduced in the first part. The method and its implementation, which was also given in the first part, are for computations where structures with different parametric dimensions are connected with continuity and smoothness. The basis functions of the method were derived in the context of connecting structures with 2D and 1D parametric dimensions. In the first part, the 2D structure was referred to as membrane and the 1D structure as cable. The method and its implementation, however, are certainly applicable also to other 2D-1D cases, and the test computations presented in the first part included shell-cable structures. Similarly, the spacecraft parachute computations presented here are with both the membrane and shell models of the parachute canopy fabric. The computer model used in the computations is for a subscale, wind-tunnel version of the Disk-Gap-Band parachute. The computations demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in 2D-1D structural mechanics computation of spacecraft parachutes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available