4.5 Article

First-principles study of Al/Al3Ni interfaces

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111896

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Al-Ni alloys are promising for high-temperature applications due to the strength of Al3Ni fibers, which are resistant to coarsening and spheroidization up to 400C. However, the characteristics of the interface between Al and Al3Ni phases have not been well understood. In this study, we constructed various supercells to model this interface and performed a first-principles study using density functional theory (DFT). We analyzed the correlation between the DFT Al/Al3Ni interfacial energies and characteristic features, such as excess free volume and the number of broken bonds. Further experimental and computational analysis is needed to improve the interface modeling of Al/Al3Ni.
Al-Ni alloys have shown promise for high-temperature applications due to the strengthening of Al3Ni fibers resistant to coarsening and spheroidization up to 400C. While the interface between Al and Al3Ni phases affects the coarsening rate of Al3Ni at elevated temperatures, its characteristics are largely unknown to date. We have constructed various supercells to model this interface and performed a first-principles study based on density functional theory (DFT). We have considered three groups of Al/Al3Ni interfaces: experimentally reported orientation relationships from the solidification studies, crystallographically similar Fe-Fe3C pearlite in-terfaces, and the family of low-index (100) termination planes. We have analyzed the correlation between the DFT Al/Al3Ni interfacial energies and characteristic features, e.g., excess free volume and the number of broken bonds. We outline the further experimental and computational analysis required to improve the interface modeling of Al/Al3Ni.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available