4.7 Review

A critical review on mechanical micro-drilling of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP and CFRP) composites

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 254, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110589

Keywords

A; polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); B; Microstructures; E; Machining; Micro-drilling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent trends in miniaturisation and high-strength fibrous composites have led to the use of mechanical microdrilling technology in fibre-reinforced polymer composites (FRPs). However, the size effect presents challenges in directly applying prior knowledge on FRP machinability to micro-drilling. The present study comprehensively reviews the challenges, recent experience, and future aspects of mechanical micro-drilling of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP, CFRP) composites, including chip removal mechanisms, geometrical defects, cutting energetics, and future research directions.
Recent trends in miniaturisation and high-strength fibrous composites encourage the use of mechanical microdrilling technology of fibre-reinforced polymer composites (FRPs). Although severe expertise has been gained through the past few decades on the machinability of FRPs, this information cannot be directly adapted to the micro-drilling mainly due to the size effect. Therefore, the main aim of the present study is to comprehensively review challenges, recent experience, and future aspects of mechanical micro-drilling of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP, CFRP) composites. The chip removal mechanisms of micro-drilling of FRPs are reviewed and compared to conventional-sized technologies. Furthermore, the micro-drilling-induced geometrical defects (delamination, burrs, fibre pull-outs etc.) and the cutting energetics are also discussed. Moreover, the future aspects and research directions are highlighted in this growing research area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available