4.7 Article

Depth classification of defects in composite materials by long-pulsed thermography and blind linear unmixing

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110359

Keywords

Active IR thermography; Defect detection and classification; Linear mixture model; Blind end-member and abundance extraction; Support vector machine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for automatically analyzing surface thermograms to classify buried defects in composite materials. The time-dependent thermal contrasts captured from the sample surface are linearly unmixed to produce results independent of the defect shapes. The method shows promising results in defect classification without the need for inspections with different source excitations.
This paper presents the automatic analysis of surface thermograms in response to a long-pulsed thermography inspection to classify buried defects in composite materials. Time-dependent thermal contrasts, captured from the sample surface by an infrared thermal camera, are linearly unmixed at the pixel scale to produce results independent of the in-plane defect shapes in the training dataset. The extended blind end-member and abundance extraction (EBEAE) method unmix the thermograms to compute feature vectors carrying information about the internal structure of the composite. The estimated abundances fed an optimized support vector machine (SVM) classifier, which learns a model from the data and labels the defects accordingly to their depths. The inspection of a calibrated glass fiber reinforced polymer proves the ability of EBEAE and SVM in defect classification with an average balanced accuracy of 96.18% in testing. This methodology clearly improves the current state of the art, even without the need for inspections with different source excitations. Furthermore, the estimated end-members automatically model the thermal response of the surface, providing crucial feedback for experimental optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available