4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on high-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of 2D and 3D textile composites

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 303, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116256

Keywords

Textiles; High-velocity impact; Compression after impact; Damage mechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the impact resistance and damage tolerance of 2D triaxially braided composites and 3D angle-interlock woven composites panels using high-velocity impact tests and compression after impact tests. Both materials show similar impact resistance but different damage patterns. X-ray CT scanning reveals the spatial variation in damage morphology caused by high-velocity impact.
This paper investigates the impact resistance and damage tolerance of 2D triaxially braided composites and 3D angle-interlock woven composites panels using high-velocity impact tests and compression after impact tests. Both materials present equivalent impact resistance with similar ballistic limit and energy absorption ratio. Nevertheless, the damage patterns of the two materials are quite different, among which, 2DTBC is characterized by global response and yarn debonding, while 3DAWC is characterized by localized damage without yarn debonding. However, in compression after impact tests, 3DAWC exhibits higher damage tolerance because the binder yarns resist buckling failure and kink bands formation during compression, resulting in higher residual compressive strength. In addition, how the damage morphology varies spatially due to the different deformation and damage modes caused by high-velocity impact is learned from X-ray CT scanning. Different from the relationship between impact energy and residual compressive strength pointed out by most research, this study also reveals a unique trend of residual compressive strength as a function of impact energy, considering both penetration and rebound conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available