4.7 Article

Investigation on 316L/W functionally graded materials fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 469, Issue -, Pages 32-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.024

Keywords

Tungsten (W); 316L; Functionally Graded Materials; Mechanical alloying; Spark plasma sintering

Funding

  1. Key Deployment Projects of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-T04]
  2. Application and Development Projects of Chongqing Sciences and Technology Commission [cstc2013yykfC00006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

316L-W (Tungsten) composite materials were fabricated by spark plasma sintering (SPS) of mechanically alloyed 316L-W powders for the development of functionally graded materials (FGMs). The effect of milling parameters on the morphology of the blended 316L/W powders and its subsequent effect on the transition between 316L and W particles during the SPS process were investigated. Samples were characterized by SEM, EDS and XRD analyses. The results so obtained show that with the increase of milling time, the mechanically activated W powder particles become thinner and smoother, with some broken fragments aggregated or inserted in the severely deformed 316L particles. A further SPS process under the conditions of 1050 degrees C x 45.5 MPa x 5 min leads to the densification of the powder compact and the formation of a distinguishable gray belt surrounding the retained W particles. Such a belt, which has a width of about 2-8 mu m depending on different milling parameters and mainly contains Fe7W6, Fe3W3C and Fe2W phases, is bound to be a transitional region between the retained W particles and the 316L matrix. This favorable behavior with regards to the formation of a transitional belt, is accompanied by a substantial increase in the hardness values of the composite. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available