4.5 Article

Influence of loading and aging on the fracture strength of an injection-molded two-piece zirconia implant restored with a zirconia abutment

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 105-115

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14022

Keywords

injection molding; loading; aging; oral implants; phase transformation; scanning electron microscopy; zirconia; zirconia abutments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to investigate the fracture strength and potential phase transformation of an injection-molded two-piece zirconia implant restored with a zirconia abutment after loading and/or aging. The results showed that dynamic loading and the combination of loading and aging reduced the fracture strength of the implant abutment combination. Hydrothermal treatment caused a shallow transformation zone which had no influence on the fracture strength.
ObjectiveTo investigate the fracture strength and potential phase transformation of an injection-molded two-piece zirconia implant restored with a zirconia abutment after loading and/or aging. MethodsThirty-two two-piece zirconia implants (4.0 mm diameter) restored with zirconia abutments were embedded according to ISO 14801 and divided into four groups (n = 8/group): Three groups were either exclusively hydrothermally treated (group HT; 85 degrees C), dynamically loaded (group DL; 10(7) cycles; 98 N), or subjected to both treatments simultaneously (group DL/HT). One group remained untreated (group 0). A sample from each group was cross-sectioned and examined by scanning electron microscopy for possible crystal phase transformation. The remaining samples were then loaded to fracture in a static loading test. A one-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyses. ResultsDuring dynamic loading, three implants of group DL and six implants of group DL/HT fractured at a load of 98 N. The fracture strength of group DL/HT (108 +/- 141 Ncm) was significantly reduced compared to the other groups (group 0: 342 +/- 36 Ncm; HT: 363 +/- 49 Ncm; DL: 264 +/- 198 Ncm) (p < .05). Fractures from group 0 and HT occurred at both implant and abutment level, whereas implants from group DL and DL/HT fractured only at implant level. A shallow monoclinic transformation zone of approximately 2 mu m was observed following hydrothermal treatment. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that dynamic loading and the combination of loading and aging reduced the fracture strength of the implant abutment combination. Hydrothermal treatment caused a shallow transformation zone which had no influence on the fracture strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available