4.7 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Ensitrelvir in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Phase 2b Part of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 76, Issue 8, Pages 1403-1411

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac933

Keywords

COVID-19; ensitrelvir; S-217622; SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease inhibitor; viral titer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 during the Omicron epidemic. The results showed that ensitrelvir treatment significantly reduced the SARS-CoV-2 titer compared to placebo. However, there was no significant difference in the total score of the 12 COVID-19 symptoms. Overall, ensitrelvir demonstrated favorable antiviral efficacy and potential clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile.
Background. This phase 2b part of a randomized phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir for mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron epidemic. Methods. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to orally receive ensitrelvir fumaric acid 125 mg (375 mg on day 1) or 250 mg (750 mg on day 1) or placebo once daily for 5 days. The co-primary endpoints were the change from baseline in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) titer on day 4 and time-weighted average change from baseline up to 120 hours in the total score of predefined 12 COVID-19 symptoms. Safety was assessed through adverse events. Results. A total of 341 patients (ensitrelvir 125-mg group: 114; ensitrelvir 250-mg group: 116; and placebo group: 111; male: 53.5-64.9%; mean age: 35.3-37.3 years) were included in the efficacy analyses. The change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 titer on day 4 was significantly greater with both ensitrelvir doses than with placebo (differences from placebo: -0.41 log(10) 50% tissue-culture infectious dose/mL; P < .0001 for both). The total score of the 12 COVID-19 symptoms did not show a significant difference between the ensitrelvir groups and placebo group. The time-weighted average change from baseline up to 120 hours was significantly greater with ensitrelvir versus placebo in several subtotal scores, including acute symptoms and respiratory symptoms. Most adverse events were mild in severity. Conclusions. Ensitrelvir treatment demonstrated a favorable antiviral efficacy and potential clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available