4.7 Article

Comparative Safety of Biologic Agents in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Active or Recent Malignancy: A Multi-Center Cohort Study

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1598-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.002

Keywords

Malignancy; Immunosuppressive; Crohn's Disease; Colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective cohort study compared the safety of TNF-a antagonists and non-TNF biologics in patients with IBD and active or recent cancer. The results showed similar risks of cancer progression and recurrence between the two treatment groups. Therefore, the choice of biologic should be based on IBD disease severity in collaboration with an oncologist.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Safety of biologic agents is a key consideration in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and active or recent cancer. We compared the safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a antagonists vs non-TNF biologics in patients with IBD with active or recent cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD and either active cancer (cohort A) or recent prior cancer (within & POUND;5 years; cohort B) who were treated with TNFa antagonists or non-TNF biologics after their cancer diagnosis. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (cohort A) or recurrence-free survival (cohort B). Safety was compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. RESULTS: In cohort A, of 125 patients (483.8 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with active cancer (age, 54 & PLUSMN; 15 y, 75% solid-organ malignancy), 10 of 55 (incidence rate [IR] per 100 py, 4.4) and 9 of 40 (IR, 10.4) patients treated with TNFa antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer progression, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of progression-free survival be-tween TNFa antagonists vs non-TNF biologics (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.25-2.30). In cohort B, of 170 patients (513 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with recent prior cancer (age, 53 & PLUSMN; 15 y, 84% solid-organ malignancy; duration of remission, 19 & PLUSMN; 19 mo), 8 of 78 (IR, 3.4) and 5 of 66 (IR 3.7) patients treated with TNFa antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer recurrence, respectively. The risk of recurrence-free survival was similar between both groups (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD with active or recent cancer, TNFa antagonists and non-TNF biologics have comparable safety. The choice of biologic should be dictated by IBD disease severity in collaboration with an oncologist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available