4.5 Review

Electrolyte Engineering for Safer Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1119-1141

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.202200588

Keywords

Thermal runaway; Lithium battery; Flame retardant; Polymer electrolyte; Solid-state electrolyte; Electrolyte additives; Electrode material; Thermal stability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite being widely used, the safety issue of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a major barrier for their application in EVs or large-scale energy storage. This study summarizes the mechanisms of thermal runaway and recent progress in electrolyte engineering for LIBs, including adding flame-retardants, using ionic liquid electrolytes, and solid electrolytes. It also discusses the strengths, weaknesses, and new directions for designing safer electrolytes.
Comprehensive SummaryDespite being widely used in people's daily life, the safety issue of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has become the major barrier for them to be applied in electrical vehicles (EVs) or large-scale energy storage. Typically, due to the use of liquid electrolytes containing flammable solvents which are easily oxidized by excessive and accumulated heat, the potential thermal runaway is a major safety concern for traditional LIBs. A strategy for a safer electrolyte design is controlling the flammability and volatility of the liquid electrolytes, to effectively prevent thermal runaway, thus avoiding fire or other risks. Through this study, the mechanisms of thermal runaway and the recent progress in electrolyte engineering toward LIBs were summarized, covering the major strategies including adding flame-retardants, the utilization of ionic liquid electrolytes and solid electrolytes. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of different strategies were discussed. New designing directions of safer electrolytes for the LIBs were also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available