4.5 Article

Cascade refrigeration system synthesis based on hybrid simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization algorithm

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 244-255

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.10.021

Keywords

Optimal design; Process systems; Particle Swarm Optimization; Simulated annealing; Mathematical modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a stochastic optimization method for the synthesis of cascade refrigeration system (CRS) with simultaneous consideration of heat integration between refrigerant and process streams. The proposed methodology was verified by a case study of CRS optimization in an ethylene plant, achieving 21.89% the total annual cost saving.
Cascade refrigeration system (CRS) can meet a wider range of refrigeration temperature requirements and is more energy efficient than single-refrigerant refrigeration system, making it more widely used in low-temperature industry processes. The synthesis of a CRS with simultaneous consideration of heat integration between refrigerant and process streams is challenging but promising for significant cost sav-ing and reduction of carbon emission. This study presented a stochastic optimization method for the syn-thesis of CRS. An MINLP model was formulated based on the superstructure developed for the CRS, and an optimization framework was proposed, where simulated annealing algorithm was used to evolve the numbers of pressure/temperature levels for all sub-refrigeration systems, and particle swarm optimiza-tion algorithm was employed to optimize the continuous variables. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology was verified by a case study of CRS optimization in an ethylene plant with 21.89% the total annual cost saving.(c) 2022 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available