4.1 Article

The use of the sodium fluorescein and YELLOW 560 nm filter for the resection of pediatric posterior fossa lesions

Journal

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1495-1500

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05798-9

Keywords

Neurosurgery; Posterior Fossa; Child; Fluorescein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to verify the feasibility, safety, and benefit of using fluorescein sodium (FL) and a YELLOW 560 nm filter in posterior fossa tumors in children. The results showed that this method has achieved good results in posterior fossa surgery and can safely and reliably remove tumors.
Purpose This study aimed to verify the feasibility, safety, and benefit of using fluorescein sodium (FL) and a YELLOW 560 nm filter in posterior fossa tumors in children. Methods All cases of pediatric posterior fossa tumors that have undergone surgery using fluorescein (2018-2022) have been included and were examined retrospectively. In those cases where resection of the tumor was planned, a blinded neuroradiologist distinguished gross total resection and subtotal resection according to the postoperative MRI findings. The surgical report and medical files were reviewed regarding the intraoperative staining grade and adverse events. The grade of fluorescent staining of the targeted lesion was assessed as described in the surgical reports. The screening was conducted for any reference to the degree of fluorescent staining: intense, medium, slight, and no staining. Results 19 cases have been included. In 14 cases, a complete resection was initially intended. In 11 of these cases, a gross total resection could be achieved (78.6%). Staining was described as intense in most cases (58.8%). Except for yellow-colored urine, no side effects obviously related to FL were found throughout the observation period. Conclusion In combination with a specific filter, FL is a reliable, safe, and feasible tool in posterior fossa surgery in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available