4.8 Article

Ionomers Modify the Selectivity of Cu-Catalyzed Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202201687

Keywords

CO2 reduction; copper; electrocatalysis; ionomers; Raman spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of three different ionomers (Nafion, Sustainion-type XA-9, and poly(terphenyl piperidinium) (PTP)) on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 using Cu-based electrocatalysts were investigated. It was found that Nafion had little influence on the performance, XA-9 promoted CO formation, and PTP favored hydrogen and formate production. The observed effects were attributed to charge transfer and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the ionomers. This study highlights the structure-sensitive nature of the ionomer-catalyst interaction in CO2RR.
Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2RR) to produce energy-rich fuels using copper-based electrocatalysts is widely studied as a possible solution to CO2 recycling. Ionomers are commonly used as binders to prepare catalyst-loaded electrodes, but their effects on the performance have not been fully investigated. In this study, electrochemical and operando Raman spectroscopic measurements are used to study the effects of three archetypical ionomers [Nafion, Sustainion-type XA-9, and poly(terphenyl piperidinium) (PTP)] on Cu-catalyzed CO2 reduction at high current densities (up to 200 mA cm(-2)). Nafion is found to have little influence, whereas XA-9 promotes the formation of CO over multicarbon products and PTP favors hydrogen and formate production. Charge and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity are found to be important parameters of the ionomers. The observed effects are attributed to the charge transfer between Cu and XA-9 weakening the CO adsorption energy, whereas the hydrophilicity of PTP reduces M-H energy. This study reveals the structure-sensitive nature of the ionomer-catalyst interaction in CO2RR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available