4.8 Article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Chemical and Biocatalytic 2'3'-Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthesis

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202201629

Keywords

biocatalysis; cyclic dinucleotides; enzyme catalysis; life cycle assessment; sustainable chemistry

Funding

  1. CLIB-Competence Center Biotechnology (CKB) - European Regional Development Fund (EFRE)
  2. North-Rhine Westphalian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Innovation, Digitalization and Energy (MWIDE) [EFRE-0300098]
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Life cycle assessments can provide insights into the environmental impact of production processes. This study compared the environmental impact of biocatalytic and chemical synthesis of 2'3'-cGAMP and found that biocatalytic synthesis is superior in all considered categories. Early assessment is crucial for making informed decisions about synthesis routes.
Life cycle assessments (LCAs) can provide insights into the environmental impact of production processes. In this study, a comparative LCA was performed for the synthesis of 2'3'-cyclic GMP-AMP (2'3'-cGAMP) in an early development stage. The cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) is of interest for pharmaceutical applications such as cancer immunotherapy. CDNs can be synthesized either by enzymes or chemical catalysis. It is not known which of the routes is more sustainable as both routes have their advantages and disadvantages, such as a poor yield for the chemical synthesis and low titers for the biocatalytic synthesis. The synthesis routes were compared for the production of 200 g 2'3'-cGAMP based on laboratory data to assess the environmental impacts. The biocatalytic synthesis turned out to be superior to the chemical synthesis in all considered categories by at least one magnitude, for example, a global warming potential of 3055.6 kg CO2 equiv. for the enzymatic route and 56454.0 kg CO2 equiv. for the chemical synthesis, which is 18 times higher. This study demonstrates the value of assessment at an early development stage, when the choice between different routes is still possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available