4.7 Article

The removal of heavy metal pollution from wastewaters using thermophilic B. cereus SO-16 bacteria

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136986

Keywords

Antioxidant activity; Bacillus cereus; Thermophilic bacteria; Antioxidant enzyme; Bioaccumulation; Mn(II); Cu(II)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the bioaccumulation, remediation, tolerance, and effects of manganese ions and copper ions on antioxidant enzymes of thermophilic Bacillus cereus SO-16. The results showed that Mn(II) was less toxic than Cu(II) to B. cereus SO-16, and the bacterium exhibited less tolerance to Mn(II) and Cu(II) ions in liquid medium compared to solid medium. The study also found that B. cereus SO-16 can be utilized in industrial wastewaters for the recovery and remediation of toxic metals.
In this study, bioaccumulation, remediation, tolerance, and effects of manganese ions (Mn(II)) and copper ions (Cu(II)) on antioxidant enzymes of thermophilic Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) SO-16 were investigated in detail. The findings of the study showed that Mn(II) was less toxic than Cu(II) to B. cereus SO-16. Moreover, B. cereus SO-16 was exhibited less tolerance to Mn(II) and Cu(II) ions in the liquid medium compared to the solid medium. The growth of bacteria was expressively effective for Mn(II) and Cu(II) concentrations of 2.5 mg/L at 24th h. The highest Mn(II) and Cu(II) bioaccumulation values after 48 h incubation of thermophilic B. cereus SO-16 were measured as 102.04 (24th h) and 87.96 (36th h) metal/dry bacteria weight. The change in morphology and functionality of B. cereus SO-16 after interaction with Mn(II) and Cu(II) was tested using various methods. The results indicated that B. cereus SO-16, a thermophilic bacterium, can be utilized in industrial wastewaters to recover and remediation of toxic metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available