4.7 Article

Occurrence, spatial distribution, and risk assessment of brominated flame retardants in farmland soils of typical provinces in China

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 313, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137356

Keywords

Brominated flame retardants; Farmland soil; Monte Carlo simulation; Spatial distribution; Risk assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the occurrence, distribution, and potential risks of 4 brominated flame retardants in farmland soils across 18 provinces of China were investigated. The results showed that DBDPE had the highest concentration, indicating its long-term use and persistence across the study areas. Comparisons with other studies suggested higher concentrations of the studied BFRs in the provinces of China. Although the risk evaluations of BFRs from farmland soils in this study were low, the results imply potential cumulative and long-term threats of BFR to rural areas with agricultural land conversion.
In the present study, we investigated the occurrence, distribution, and potential risks of 4 brominated flame retardants in farmland soils across 18 provinces of China. The total mean concentrations of the BFRs were in order as DBDPE > BDE209 > HBB > TBB. DBDPE concentration was highest at 177.208 ng/kg, revealing its long-term use and persistence across the study areas. In parts of China, DBDPE was highest in the south (Sichuan, Shaanxi and Guangdong provinces), BDE209 was highest in the south (Sichuan province) and north (Jilin province), while HBB was highest in the south (Sichuan province) and east (Anhui and Zhejiang provinces) of China. Comparisons of the results in this study to other reported studies in different regions indicated that the studied BFRs concentrations were higher in the studied provinces of China. Pearson correlation between BFRs revealed both positive and negative associations within the BFRs groups and between BFRs and soil properties (SOM, CEC, pH, EC and PS%). The mean hazard quotients (HQ) of ecological risks ranged from 8.76 x 10-6 to 1.16 x 10-2 (HQ < 1) while non-carcinogenic human health risk evaluation for adults ranged from 7.05 x 10-7 -7.48 x 10-4 (HQ < 1) and for children 2.99 x 10-4 -4.30 x 10-2 (HQ < 1). Although the risk evaluations of BFRs from farmland soils in this study were low, the results serve as useful indicators of potential cumulative and long-term threats of BFR to rural areas where there is a high conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available