4.7 Article

Machine learning and deep learning modeling and simulation for predicting PM2.5 concentrations

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136353

Keywords

PM2; 5; Deep learning; XGBoost; Machine learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun- dation of China (NSFC) [52122406, 22108314]
  2. Hunan High- tech Industry Technology Innovation Leading plan [2022GK4056]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2021JJ40717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized machine learning and deep learning models to predict particulate matter concentrations at two monitoring sites in central China's Hunan Province. The results showed that the XGBoost model outperformed the deep learning model in terms of prediction ability. The influential mechanism of meteorological variables on PM2.5 concentrations was analyzed.
Particulate matter (PM) pollution greatly endanger human physical and mental health, and it is of great practical significance to predict PM concentrations accurately. This study measured one-year monitoring data of six main meteorological parameters and PM2.5 concentrations independently at two monitoring sites in central China's Hunan Province. These datasets were then employed to train, validate, and evaluate the proposed extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model and the fully connected neural network deep learning model, respectively. The performances of the two models were compared, analyzed, and optimized through model parameter tuning. The XGBoost model had better prediction ability with R2 higher than 0.761 in the complete test dataset. When the complete dataset was divided into stratified sub-sets by daytime-nighttime periods, the value of R2 increased to 0.856 in the nighttime test dataset. The feature importance and influential mechanism of meteorological variables on PM2.5 concentrations were analyzed and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available