4.4 Article

Sensitive determination of urea in luciferin chemiluminescence system using an experimental design

Journal

CHEMICAL PAPERS
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages 2571-2580

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-022-02647-6

Keywords

Bioluminescent earthworms; Box-Behnken design; Chemiluminescence; Luciferin; Urea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a sensitive and rapid chemiluminescence method was developed to detect the lowest concentration of urea in the luminescent system of bioluminescent earthworms. Response surface methodology was utilized to optimize the key variables and evaluate their effects on the chemiluminescence emission. The method showed a linear response in the urea concentration range of 1 x 10(-2) to 5 x 10(-9) M with a detection limit of 3.25 x 10(-10) M under the optimum conditions.
In this study, a sensitive and rapid chemiluminescence (CL) approach was developed to determine the lowest concentration of urea in the luminescent system of bioluminescent earthworms based on the urea reaction with luciferin, a common substrate for bioluminescent earthworms. To this end, response surface methodology (RSM) was utilized through a Box-Behnken design (BBD) to optimize the key variables such as luciferin (2 x 10(-4)-2 x 10(-2) M), urea (1 x 10(-5)-1 x 10(-3) M), and the mixture of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as oxidant (2 x 10(-4)-2 x 10(-2) M) and also evaluate their interactive effects on the CL emission. The linear response of CL intensity was detected in the urea concentration ranging from 1 x 10(-2) to 5 x 10(-9) M (R-2 = 0.9918). The detection limit under the optimum conditions was calculated 3.25 x 10(-10) M. This rapid and facile method required low amounts of reagent for the successful detection of urea. Based on the results, these methods can offer an opportunity for the potential role of the bioluminescent earthworms in biological and non-biological analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available