4.7 Article

Structure and mechanical properties of copper-lead and copper-zinc borate glasses

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 55-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.12.005

Keywords

Copper; Borate; Glass; Structure; Elastic moduli; Indentation toughness

Funding

  1. Region Bretagne (France) through ARED program [12006858]
  2. German Science Foundation through the priority program 1594 [WO 1220/10-1]
  3. Mercator fellowship program of the German Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper-lead and copper-zinc borate glasses with different copper contents were prepared and studied for correlations between structure and mechanical properties, where the cations are used to tailor the intermediate-range speciation of borate groups. Structural characterization was done by optical absorption, electron spin resonance (ESR), Raman and infrared (IR) spectroscopy. The mechanical properties were investigated through in-depth instrumented indentation and mechanical resonance analyses. The zinc metaborate glass series shows a high disproportionation of metaborate into mainly trigonal pyroborate [B2O5](4-) and polyborate [Bempty set(3)](0) units, while the lead borate glass series exhibits a network based on trigonal [Bempty set(2)O](-) and tetrahedral [Bempty set(4)](-) metaborate units and a minor PbO-pseudophase(empty set = bridging oxygen and O = non-bridging oxygen). For both glass types, the addition of copper oxide results in a more homogenous network containing [Bempty set(2)O](-) and [Bempty set(4)](-) metaborate units. This induces an enhancement of the elastic moduli and hardness in the lead borate glass series, but a decrease of these properties in the copper-zinc borate glasses, whereby copper-zinc borate glasses are stiffer and harder than copper-lead borate glasses. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available