4.7 Article

Prevailing surface reactions in the plasma-catalytic ammonia synthesis with Ru/CeO2 and Ru/Ti-CeO2

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 455, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140691

Keywords

Plasma catalysis; Non-thermal plasma; Dielectric barrier discharge; Nitrogen fixation; Ammonia synthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed to investigate one of the rate-limiting steps of the plasma process, which is N-2 bond breaking. The addition of TiO2 in the catalysts improved the energy efficiency of the plasma-catalytic NH3 synthesis.
Sustainable plasma-catalytic NH3 synthesis is receiving an increasing amount of interest as a greener alternative for the conventional Haber-Bosch (HB) process. However, the best energy efficiency for the plasma synthesis reported so far is still low compared to the one of HB. This research was conducted to experimentally investigate one of the plasma process rate-limiting steps, which is N-2 bond breaking. This study aimed at identifying the enhancing-surface reactions as well as limiting surface reactions such as H-inhibition. Ru/CeO2 and Ru/Ti-CeO2 were tested in a packed-bed DBD reactor to investigate the influence of TiO2 addition, which possibly prevented H-inhibition, and simultaneously enhanced different surface reactions. Variations of feed gas ratios and designed operation schemes were studied to elucidate the effect of the catalyst composition. Results showed that Ru/TiCeO2 outperformed Ru/CeO2 in terms of energy consumption and a N-2-rich atmosphere was needed to obtain minima of 84.5 MJ mol(-1) and 126.5 MJ mol(-1), respectively. The addition of TiO2 in the catalysts provided more surface sites for H-2 to adsorb on, which was identified as main reason for improving the energy efficiency of the plasma-catalytic NH3 synthesis. Three detailed reaction mechanisms were proposed to elaborate on the behavior between N-2-rich plasma and Ru/Ti-CeO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available