4.7 Article

Efficient transport of active species in triple-phase boundary through Paddle-Effect of ionomer for alkaline fuel cells

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 452, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139498

Keywords

Catalyst layer; Alkaline fuel cell; Ionomer; Active species transport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the transport mechanism of active species in the catalyst layer of alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) by synthesizing and characterizing ionomers. The results indicate that the free flow of water and the paddle effect of the ionomer substituent play a crucial role in enhancing active species transport in the catalyst layer.
The activity of the catalyst layer is crucial for the performance of alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs). However, the microscopic transport mechanism of active species (gas, H2O, OH-) in the triple-phase boundary (TPB), which is composed of gas, liquid, and solid catalyst particles, has not yet been elucidated so far. Herein, quaternized polyphenylene oxide (PPO) ionomers with different hydratability are synthesized and characterized by the electrochemical performance analysis and molecular dynamics simulations. The results indicate that the mass transport of active species in the TPB depends on the free flow of water and the locked water layer hinders the displacement and transport of active species on the catalyst surface. Furthermore, claw shaped hydrophobic substituents of the ionomers are able to agitate the locked water transport layer on the catalyst surface in a manner that resembled the motion of a paddle and thus enhances active species transport in the TPB. The free-water-dominated active species transport mechanism and the paddle effect of the claw shaped ionomer substituent lay the foundation for the construction of highly active catalyst layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available