4.5 Article

Reactive absorption of carbon dioxide in aqueous n-methyldiethanoloamine solutions catalysed with carbonic anhydrase in a rotating packed bed (RPB)

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2023.109266

Keywords

N-methyldiethanolamine; CO2 absorption; RPB; Rotating packed bed; MDEA; Carbonic anhydrase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the absorption of carbon dioxide in a rotating packed bed with two different types of metal foam packing material and two types of liquid absorbents. The addition of carbonate anhydrase significantly improved the absorption efficiency but also narrowed the operating window. The results showed significantly higher mass transfer efficiency compared to a packed column absorption process.
Studies on absorption of carbon dioxide in the rotating packed bed (RPB) were performed with two different types of metal foam packing, and two types of liquid absorbents: 30 wt.% solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine in water, with and without the addition of 0.2 wt.% of carbonic anhydrase. Different rotation speeds, gas flow rates and liquid flow rates were investigated. Results were evaluated using normalized interphase molar flow. Increased rotation speeds and phase flow rates positively affected the interphase mole flow of CO2, but high gas and liquid flow rates limited the operating window due to flooding. The addition of anhydrase significantly increased the absorption efficiency, but also narrowed the operating window. The addition of carbonic anhydrase resulted in an increase in the degree of absorption 2-5-fold for the analogous gas and liquid flow rates, compared to the amine without the biocatalyst. The highest normalized mole flow of 66.3 kmol h-1 m- 3 was observed for NC1116 packing with the solvent containing anhydrase, while the highest normalized mole flow for solvent without catalyst was 26.2 kmol h-1 m- 3. The results were compared with analogous absorption processes in a packed column and showed up to 50-fold higher mass transfer efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available