4.2 Review

Do kafirin bioplastic materials have unique functional characteristics?

Journal

CEREAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 539-555

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cche.10648

Keywords

bioplastics; disulfide bond crosslinking; gluten; hydrophobicity; kafirin; zein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review evaluates the properties of kafirin bioplastics compared to zein and gluten bioplastics, finding that kafirin bioplastics have superior functional properties to commercial zein bioplastics.
Background and ObjectivesThere is considerable interest in kafirin, sorghum prolamin, as a bioplastic material because it apparently produces bioplastics with superior functional properties. This review evaluates the evidence, focussing on research directly comparing the properties of kafirin bioplastics (films and elastomers) with those from zein and gluten. FindingsKafirin and zein are more hydrophobic than gluten but there is little difference in hydrophobicity between them. Kafirin and zein films have better moisture barrier properties than gluten films. Films made from total kafirin (alpha-, beta-, and gamma-kafirins) are stronger and take up less moisture than films from commercial zein (essentially alpha-zein). However, total kafirin- and total zein films have similar moisture uptake. Also, there is little difference in oxygen barrier properties between total kafirin- and commercial zein films. Total kafirin elastomers have better elastic recovery than commercial- and total zein elastomers and similar elastic recovery to gluten. ConclusionsThe better functional properties of kafirin bioplastics compared to commercial zein bioplastics seems to be largely due to the greater disulfide bonded polymerization of kafirin polypeptides, involving the cysteine-rich beta- and gamma-kafirin classes. Significance and NoveltyThis work should stimulate research into disulfide-bonded polymerization of prolamins to improve their bioplastic functionality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available