4.7 Article

Morphology of lithium niobium oxide thin film ultrasonic transducers deposited by RF magnetron sputtering

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 16297-16304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.228

Keywords

Surface morphology; Magnetron sputtering; Lithium niobate; High temperature annealing; Ultrasonic transducer; Phase segregation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of sample position on the morphology of lithium niobium oxide thin film transducers were studied. At the center position, the thin film exhibited good ultrasonic response, while at farther positions, complex sunflower-like structures were formed, degrading the performance of the transducers. Additionally, the annealing temperature and time were observed to impact the morphology, crystal structure, element distribution, and ultrasonic response.
Lithium niobium oxide (LNO) thin film high temperature ultrasonic transducers have been deposited using radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Effects of the sample position in the sample plane on the thin film morphology are studied. In the center of the sputtering area, where the radial distance is 0 mm, the LNO thin film transducers are a mixture of LiNbO3/LiNb3O8 phases with well developed columnar structure and good ultrasonic response. At the radial distance of 10-40 mm, complex sunflower-like morphological features are formed, which may develop due to preferable crystallization of the sputtered material on particle seeds, significant difference in atomic mass of Li and Nb, and space confinement. The formation of wedge-like sunflowers reduces the per-formance of the ultrasonic transducers. In addition, the impacts of annealing temperature and time on morphology, crystal structure, element distribution, and ultrasonic response are also observed. The long-term annealing at 700 degrees C (for 100 h) upgrades the ultrasonic response, and for prolonged annealing up to 312 h, the ultrasonic response gradually degrades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available