4.7 Article

Improvement of extrudability and self-support of emulsion-filled starch gel for 3D printing: Increasing oil content

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 301, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120293

Keywords

3D printing; Emulsion-filled gel; Starch; Rheological properties; Extrudability; Self-support

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mechanism of enhancing the extrudability and self-support of S-EFG by increasing oil content during 3D printing. The results showed that increasing the oil content of the emulsion improved the physical properties of the gel, making the printed products less prone to collapse. Additionally, gels with higher oil content had better extrudability and retained more beta-carotene after heat treatment.
This work investigated the mechanism of increasing oil content in synchronously enhancing extrudability and self-support of beta-carotene loaded starch-based emulsion-filled gels (S-EFG) during 3D printing in terms of gel properties. Increasing emulsion oil content enhanced the storage modulus, relaxation modulus, and hardness of gels, which indicated sodium caseinate-stabilized emulsions were active fillers in the starch gel. Thus, printed products with high oil content were less prone to collapse when selecting models with higher height. In addition, lower yield stress, relaxation time, and higher frequency dependence were observed in S-EFG with higher oil content (30-50 %) due to the lubricating/plasticizing effect of oils, which corresponded to the smoother extruded filament. Furthermore, the retention of beta-carotene in high oil content gel was higher after heat treatment due to denser microstructure. These results indicated that the extrudability and self-supporting of S-EFG were simul-taneously improved by increasing oil content under the active filling effect and lubricating/plasticizing effect of emulsions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available