4.7 Article

A phase 1b single-arm trial of intratumoral oncolytic virus V937 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from the CAPRA study

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1405-1415

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03314-1

Keywords

Clinical trial; Oncolytic virus; V937; Pembrolizumab; Melanoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CAPRA study suggests that the combination of Coxsackievirus A21 (V937) + pembrolizumab may induce responses in patients with melanoma without a typical immune-active microenvironment.
Background CAPRA (NCT02565992) evaluated Coxsackievirus A21 (V937) + pembrolizumab for metastatic/unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. Methods Patients received intratumoral V937 on days 1, 3, 5, and 8 (then every 3 weeks [Q3W]) and intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W from day 8. Primary endpoint was safety. Results Median time from first dose to data cutoff was 32.0 months. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; 14% (5/36) of patients experienced grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 47% (complete response, 22%). Among 17 responders, 14 (82%) had responses >= 6 months. Among 8 patients previously treated with immunotherapy, 3 responded (1 complete, 2 partial). Responses were associated with increased serum CXCL10 and CCL22, suggesting viral replication contributes to antitumor immunity. For responders versus nonresponders, there was no difference in baseline tumor PD-L1 expression, ICAM1 expression, or CD3(+) infiltrates. Surprisingly, the baseline cell density of CD3(+)CD8(-) T cells in the tumor microenvironment was significantly lower in responders compared with nonresponders (P = 0.0179). Conclusions These findings suggest responses to this combination may be seen even in patients without a typical immune-active microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available