4.3 Article

The association between microRNA polymorphisms and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A meta-analysis

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102285

Keywords

Meta-analysis; Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia; MicroRNA; Polymorphism; Case-control study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis found no significant association between miR-146a rs2910164 and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk, but the polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 and miR-612 rs12803915 may be related to the development of the disease.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the relationship between microRNA polymorphisms and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia comprehensively. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, Clinicaltrials.gov, ProQuest, and Open Grey databases were used to find relevant papers. Using the STATA 16.0 and CMA 3.0 software, the significance of relationships between microRNA polymorphisms and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk was evaluated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) for five genetic models. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no significant association between the polymorphism of miR-146a rs2910164 and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk in different genetic models. Also, in the sensitivity analysis, removing Xue's study from the analysis indicated that both the homozygote and recessive models are significantly affected. Additionally, there was a statistically significant relationship between the polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 (in the homozygote and recessive models) and miR-612 rs12803915 (in the allele and dominant models) and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk. These findings suggest that the rs4938723 and rs12803915 polymorphisms may have a role in the development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available