4.3 Review

Propofol misuse in medical professions: a scoping review

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02382-2

Keywords

medical professionals; propofol; substance diversion; substance misuse

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to describe the demographic characteristics of medical professionals misusing propofol and the outcomes associated with such misuse. Anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists were commonly identified as misusers. Death was a common indication of misuse, while rehabilitation and death were common final outcomes associated with propofol misuse.
Purpose We aimed to describe the current literature concerning propofol misuse in medical professionals, specifically relating to the individual demographics of those misusing propofol and the outcomes of propofol misuse. Methods We conducted a retrospective scoping review of the literature using a modified PRISMA approach. We used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant studies based on search terms. Studies describing individual medical professionals misusing propofol were included. Results Twenty-four articles describing 88 individual cases of propofol misuse were included for data charting and analysis. Anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse anesthetists were most commonly identified. Death was a common method of identification of misuse, while rehabilitation and death were common final outcomes associated with propofol misuse. Conclusions Despite knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of propofol by those misusing this medication, death was a common outcome reported in the literature. Data related to long-term outcomes including re-entry to clinical practice or success of rehabilitation were limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available