4.6 Article

A hybrid stacking framework optimized method for TBM performance prediction

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-03047-6

Keywords

Tunnel boring machine; Penetration rate; Whale optimization algorithm; Stacking framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new hybrid intelligent model named Stacking-WOA was developed to predict TBM penetration rate (PR) using the whale optimization algorithm. The results showed that the Stacking-WOA model outperformed the single algorithm models in predicting TBM PR and had stronger learning and generalization ability for a small number of samples.
The tunnel boring machine (TBM) performance directly affects the construction progress. The existing methods are difficult to improve and optimize the TBM performance. A new hybrid intelligent model named stacking framework optimized by whale optimization algorithm (Stacking-WOA) was developed to predict TBM penetration rate (PR) to overcome this problem. For this purpose, taking the tunnel of Shenzhen Metro Line 8 as an example, the most relevant parameters of TBM performance were collected and measured. In addition, three single models, including light gradient boosting machine, random forests, and extreme learning machine, were proposed to predict TBM PR and compared with the Stacking-WOA model. Moreover, to compare the results of these models and identify the best predictive models, several performance indices, such as the correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error, mean absolute percentage error, and a10-index, were computed to identify the best predictive models. The results show that the Stacking-WOA model is the most accurate in predicting TBM PR, and the stacking model outperforms the single algorithm model and has stronger learning and generalization ability for a small number of samples. Therefore, the stacking WOA model can accurately predict TBM PR and help guide and optimize tunneling construction projects in similar geological conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available