4.6 Article

Prolonged gut microbial alterations in post-transplant survivors of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 201, Issue 4, Pages 725-737

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18574

Keywords

aGVHD; allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; cGVHD; gut microbiota; second cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the persistence of gut microbial alterations in long-term survivors after allo-HSCT and their association with the development and exacerbation of late complications.
Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota has been reported to increase early complications after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, it remains unclear whether gut microbial alterations persist during late complications, such as chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) or secondary cancers. Here, we analysed the gut microbiota of 59 patients who survived for 1-21.7 years (median, 6.4 years) after allo-HSCT. Long-term survivors showed lower gut microbial diversity than the age- and sex-matched healthy controls. This decreased diversity was reflected in the reduced abundance of the butyrate-producing bacteria. Patients with a history of grade 3 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) exhibited higher Veillonella abundance than patients with a history of grade 1-2 or non-aGVHD cases. The abundance of Faecalibacterium showed no decrease only in limited cGVHD cases. Additionally, the microbial structure in the secondary cancer group was significantly different (p < 0.05) from that in the non-secondary cancer group. This study is the first to show that microbial dysbiosis is present over a 10-year lifetime after discharge following allo-HSCT. Our results suggest that these prolonged gut microbial alterations may be associated with the development and exacerbation of late complications in post-transplant survivors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available