4.5 Review

Bioimpedance spectroscopy for breast cancer-related lymphedema assessment: clinical practice guidelines

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06850-7

Keywords

Breast cancer; Lymphedema; Bioimpedance spectroscopy; L-Dex; Clinical guidelines

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a significant concern for breast cancer patients, and early detection and treatment have been shown to be beneficial. New technology like bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) can detect subclinical BCRL, allowing for early intervention and lower rates of chronic BCRL. This study presents updated clinical practice guidelines for the utilization of BIS in assessing BCRL.
Purpose Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a significant concern for patients following breast cancer treatment, and assessment for BCRL represents a key component of survivorship efforts. Growing data has demonstrated the benefits of early detection and treatment of BCRL. Traditional diagnostic modalities are less able to detect reversible subclinical BCRL while newer techniques such as bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) have shown the ability to detect subclinical BCRL, allowing for early intervention and low rates of chronic BCRL with level I evidence. We present updated clinical practice guidelines for BIS utilization to assess for BCRL. Methods and Results Review of the literature identified a randomized controlled trial and other published data which form the basis for the recommendations made. The final results of the PREVENT trial, with 3-year follow-up, demonstrated an absolute reduction of 11.3% and relative reduction of 59% in chronic BCRL (through utilization of compression garment therapy) with BIS as compared to tape measurement. This is in keeping with real-world data demonstrating the effectiveness of BIS in a prospective surveillance model. For optimal outcomes patients should receive an initial pre-treatment measurement and subsequently be followed at a minimum quarterly for first 3 years then biannually for years 4-5, then annually as appropriate, consistent with previous guidelines; the target for intervention has been changed from a change in L-Dex of 10 to 6.5. The lack of pre-operative measure does not preclude inclusion in the prospective surveillance model of care. Conclusion The updated clinical practice guidelines present a standardized approach for a prospective model of care using BIS for BCRL assessment and supported by evidence from a randomized controlled trial as well as real-world data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available