Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Prevalence of Missing Data in the National Cancer Database and Association With Overall Survival
Daniel X. Yang et al.
JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)
Variation in long-term oncologic outcomes by type of cancer center accreditation: An analysis of a SEER-Medicare population with pancreatic cancer
Zhi Ven Fong et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Is there value in cancer center accreditation?
Cary Jo Schlick et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Missing tumor measurement (TM) data in the search for alternative TM-based endpoints in cancer clinical trials
Ming-Wen An et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
A Comparison of the NCDB and SEER Database for Research Involving Head and Neck Cancer
Tyler A. Janz et al.
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY (2019)
Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in US Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014
Katherine Mallin et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)
Disparities in surgery for early-stage cancer: the impact of refusal
Joseph Rapp et al.
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2019)
Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
Robert J. Motzer et al.
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2019)
Lessons Learned Regarding Missing Clinical Stage in the National Cancer Database
Tanya L. Hoskin et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)
Validity of using multiple imputation for unknown stage at diagnosis in populationbased cancer registry data
Qingwei Luo et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research
Daniel J. Boffa et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2017)
How generalizable are the SEER registries to the cancer populations of the USA?
Tzy-Mey Kuo et al.
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2016)
Design, implementation and reporting strategies to reduce the instance and impact of missing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data: a systematic review
Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber et al.
BMJ OPEN (2016)
Time to Surgery and Breast Cancer Survival in the United States
Richard J. Bleicher et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2016)
Surgery in high-volume hospitals not commission on cancer accreditation leads to increased cancer-specific survival for early-stage lung cancer
Elizabeth A. David et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2015)
A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects
Kirsten Brubakk et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2015)
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR
Stef van Buuren et al.
Journal of Statistical Software (2015)
Missing Data: Five Practical Guidelines
Daniel A. Newman
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2014)
Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: A population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000-2007
Camille Maringe et al.
ACTA ONCOLOGICA (2013)
Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study
S. Walters et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2013)
Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: Implications for Quality of Care Research
Katherine Mallin et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2013)
Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?
Melissa J. Azur et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH (2011)
Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World
John W. Graham
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
Comparison of Commission on Cancer-Approved and -Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data Base
Karl Y. Bilimoria et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2009)
Sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of a missing covariate on survival analyses using cancer registry data
Brian L. Egleston et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2009)
Prevention of missing data in clinical research studies
Stephen R. Wisniewski et al.
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY (2006)